The issue of continuous professional development (CPD) in relation to Technology-Enhanced Learning (TEL) has recently been raised by Graham Attwell in his Pontydysgu blog. Graham aims to write a literature review around the subject, and is keen to get input from a wide audience. His blog highlights the importance of the role of TEL in  teachers’/lecturers’ CPD , which has perhaps received less attention than the impact of TEL on learners. However, as JISC studies on learners’ experiences of e-learning have shown, learners’ appreciation of TEL is often greatly influenced by the guidance and example given to them by their teachers.

Some teachers are natural innovators, but most follow rather than lead when it comes to using technology in their teaching, and some will be highly resistant to change (the so-called ‘laggards’ in Rogers’ ‘diffusion’  theory ). It makes sense to find  methods of CPD that might bridge the ‘chasm’ (as described by Moore) between the innovative minority and the slower majority. However, there may always be the barriers of insufficient time and money to hurdle!
Significant effort has gone into the development of schemes, frameworks and standards of CPD for TEL, particularly in the Lifelong Learning sector. Up to date guides can also be of great value, and also resources of the sort produced by JISC.  But  perhaps less thought has gone into the actual delivery of training, though TEL practitioners such as Joyce Seitzinger  have ideas. It seems sensible to me to apply similar pedagogic (or andragogic in this context) principles to the delivery of CPD for teachers as they themselves would apply to their students. Hence, the outcomes of CPD should be well-defined and their value and relevance made clear. Training activities should be varied and active, address a range of learning preferences, and incorporate an element of personalisation or self-direction. Positive reinforcement should be used where appropriate, and existing knowledge and skills should be taken into account. It is probably also benefical to provide training in a ‘little and often’ way rather than in large, infrequent chunks. In short, CPD  delivery should be as enjoyable, motivating and informative as the best lessons/lectures, and should avoid too much passive listening or pages of small print . ‘Testing’ scenarios, as in inspections or peer observations,  may also have  limited developmental value.

Based on the above thoughts, here are some approaches to CPD that I believe are worth exploring:-
• Discuss TEL within regular team/departmental meetings, or in informal gatherings, making reference to subject-specific good practice. It may be useful to look at technology use from different angles (as described in a recent blog post by Paul Richardson), and important to respect differing points of view
• Ask teachers individually about what has gone well in their teaching – ie. appreciative inquiry. Use this to find examples of good practice, and identify situations where TEL could have a positive impact
• Liaise with Education/Initial Teacher Training (ITT) departments to set up projects with teachers to explore particular technologies in the context of their teaching.  Action research and other scholarly approaches could be incorporated.
• link TEL CPD to wider schemes of accreditation and progression.

In addition to these approaches, organisations need to raise awareness of useful technologies (because ‘you don’t know what you don’t know’),  via a range of methods  including bite-size, visual chunks (eg. TeacherTube/YouTube videos on an intranet). Organisations could also make use of ‘champions’ to aid dissemination  and promote good practice, and their managers should aim to provide  leadership in the use of TEL.

What other approaches/factors are should be considered? Conversely, what hasn’t worked? Your experiences and comments are most welcome!