<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RSC Wales Teaching and Learning Blog &#187; A levels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.rsc-wales.ac.uk/blog/tag/a-levels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.rsc-wales.ac.uk</link>
	<description>RSC Wales Teaching and Learning Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:52:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Not much sign of the ‘e’ in ‘Advanced’ (!)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.rsc-wales.ac.uk/blog/2009/08/11/not-much-sign-of-the-%e2%80%98e%e2%80%99-in-%e2%80%98advanced%e2%80%99/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.rsc-wales.ac.uk/blog/2009/08/11/not-much-sign-of-the-%e2%80%98e%e2%80%99-in-%e2%80%98advanced%e2%80%99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christine Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[e-assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eteaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Learning Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-portfolios]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.rsc-wales.ac.uk/blog/2009/08/11/not-much-sign-of-the-%e2%80%98e%e2%80%99-in-%e2%80%98advanced%e2%80%99/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[QCA (Qualifications and Curriculum Authority &#8211; but now QCDA) originally had high hopes  for the involvement of e-assessment in high-stakes, summative assessments like A levels. As we head towards Autumn 2009, there is little evidence of this, as highlighted in a recent Guardian article. Whilst the use of various technologies for formative assessment seems to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QCA (Qualifications and Curriculum Authority &#8211; but now <a href="http://www.qcda.gov.uk/" title="qcda">QCDA</a>) originally had high hopes  for the involvement of e-assessment in high-stakes, summative assessments like A levels. As we head towards Autumn 2009, there is little evidence of this, as highlighted in a recent <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2009/jul/21/online-exams-schools" title="guardia">Guardian article</a>. Whilst the use of various technologies for <em>formative</em> assessment seems to be expanding (see RSC Wales <a href="http://blogs.rsc-wales.ac.uk/blog/2008/11/28/e-assessment-in-focus/" title="blog">blog</a> of Nov, 2008), take-up of e-assessment for <em>summative</em> purposes in schools and colleges is mainly restricted to  certain GCSE subjects (eg. <a href="http://web.aqa.org.uk/over/onscreen_tests.php" title="aqa">Science, AQA</a>), and courses on basic and vocational skills (eg. <a href="http://www.city-and-guilds.co.uk/cps/rde/xchg/SID-6C18F34A-2588F5F6/cgonline/hs.xsl/660.html" title="gola">GOLA</a>).<br />
The only technology-enabled A level examinations I’m aware of (but I’m happy to be corrected!) are run by the Welsh examination board <a href="http://www.wjec.co.uk/" title="wjec">WJEC </a>(there have also been trials of onscreen assessment in some IB examinations (ie. <a href="http://www.ibo.org/" title="ib">International Baccalaureate</a>). This summer, WJEC ran online examinations in 25 centres for two A level subjects &#8211; Applied Business and ICT –through the medium of Welsh as well as English ( the bilingual aspect is significant, since Welsh-language versions of questions tend to take up more space than their English counterparts, which may create issues of formatting).<br />
There are many reasons why A levels remain largely paper-based, not least the cost of equipping institutions with the necessary technology and support. There are also good reasons why examination boards should look further at e-assessment – for example, the value of multimedia and interactivity for learners, and ease of marking for examiners. They might start with internally-assessed components (eg. course-work, science practicals, extended essays etc), and make use of technologies such as <a href="http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/documents/effectivepracticeeportfolios.aspx" title="e-ports">e-portfolios </a>. This would extend the range of evidence that could be examined (eg. images, audio, blogs), and provide far more flexibility for internal and external moderation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.rsc-wales.ac.uk/blog/2009/08/11/not-much-sign-of-the-%e2%80%98e%e2%80%99-in-%e2%80%98advanced%e2%80%99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

